ASI-LIB-016 governance measurement framework

Measuring AI R&D Automation

Alan Chan, Ranay Padarath, Joe Kwon, Hilary Greaves, Markus Anderljung

AI R&D automation oversight demand diagram
Figure via ar5iv rendering of arXiv:2603.03992

This is governance that technical teams should actually want: measure the acceleration curve. If AI systems begin automating the work of AI researchers, capability progress, safety progress, compute allocation, and oversight capacity can diverge quickly.

Why it belongs here

ASI strategy needs telemetry. The paper proposes tracking dimensions such as AI R&D spending share, researcher time allocation, and AI subversion incidents. Those metrics are imperfect, but they make a rapidly changing research process visible enough to manage.

Pro-ASI read

The goal is not to slow research by default. The goal is to know when automated R&D is becoming a major input to frontier progress, so institutions can increase evals, security, reproducibility, and deployment confidence at the same tempo.